I have intended to review the blogroll here for some time and have now made three worthwhile additions to the Art and Music category. Bill Mather and Daniel Gerhartz are two of my favourite painters of portraits and the husband and wife team, Melanie and Nick Beale, are truly amazing painters of dogs, cats and horses. Enjoy.
Blogging
In reply to the comment from Philip Baillie following my earlier post about Cardiff Bloggers, it would not be appropriate for me to pronounce on the “best” of the Cardiff-based blogs that I have discovered so far – whatever “best” might mean. I have linked to those that seemed the most interesting, to me anyway, when I discovered them back in September and I have found more since then.
I remain interested in finding blogs, produced (mainly) by private individuals based in and around Cardiff, rather than by commercial concerns, and preferably avoiding football, rugby and pop music obsessives! The idea is to help create an ever-widening network of local bloggers of all ages with a great variety of interests.
My earlier “Cardiff Bloggers” post was easily found via Google, or via the WordPress.com search engine, yet no other Cardiff-based blogger has contacted me so far. Therefore it seems unlikely that any other individual or group shares my interest in assembling a local network.
In this Capital City of Wales there must be more than a couple of dozen non-commercial bloggers in a population which is well in excess of 300,000.
From time to time I delete a few links from this blog and insert new ones. Neither additions nor deletions are necessarily permanent. The idea is to limit the total number of links while still guiding my visitors to “new” blogs and websites that have caught my attention for one reason or another, if only temporarily.
I have been shuffling the links again recently and have added the following:
Karin Wells Studio - interesting content and not all of it art and painting.
Carolee S. Clark - a painter with an attractive style.
Twitter – needs no introduction.
Nick Robinson’s Newslog - a good source of commentary on UK politics.
The Cycling Lawyer - for expert commentary on the legal issues relevant to cyclists.
Cycle Social - a site with a difference for cyclists of all kinds, sporting, road, commuting, leisure, slow, whatever. The site is relatively new but growing steadily and looking forward to a relaunch early in the New Year. It has enormous potential for cyclists and local clubs who have the inagination and initiative to use it. I signed up (free) and put myself on the “Members Map” and look forward to meeting (and cycling with) other local members.
I have been signed up to Twitter for almost two months and it has been both entertaining and informative. This evening I spent some time sorting out a small pile of sheet music and it reminded me to look on Twitter for others with similar musical interests. This led me to various online stories and I couldn’t resist including links to two of them here. The first is about musical education in UK schools and it reminded me how lucky I had been. The second is about that brilliant violinist, Joshua Bell and I won’t say any more in case I spoil the story.
It is late in the evening of March 18th and I have received no reply to my email to Alphainventions dated March 14th and no reply (from Alphainventions) to my comment on their site on March 16th. It doesn’t look as if a reply will be forthcoming so I have removed the Alpha link from my blogroll. This is because, first, I cannot recommend a site whose webmaster doesn’t appear to have the basic good manners (let alone the PR savvy) to reply to a perfectly reasonable question and, secondly, the absence of a reply, in conjunction with posts and comments by several other bloggers on blogs and forums that I have read, reinforces my suspicion that Alpha’s webmaster would rather not discuss the nature of my blog’s recent statistics because he doesn’t want me (or anyone else) to know the whole truth.
On another topic, thanks to Peter Salmon’s site I have discovered SiteMeter and have decided to give it a try. It compiles statistics relating to site visitors, page views etc. and looks as if it could be useful. I am hoping that WordPress and SiteMeter stats might complement each other and enable a more realistic interpretation of what is happening than either of them alone. I have also added Feedjit to this blog because it is interesting to see, in real time, where visitors are coming from and when.
I may well continue to test Alphainventions for a while to see whether, in conjunction with the new additions to my blog, I can arrive at any clearer conclusions about the seemingly inflated statistics – if they won’t tell me what their game is then I will have to find out for myself.
I started this blog in 2007 but did little with it until March 2008. Clustrmap was added in April 2008 and was counting visits to the site from April 14th. By the time Clustrmap started counting I had accumulated no more than 200 views in my WordPress stats. Therefore, I expected Clustrmap’s “visits” and WordPress stats “views” to increase at the same rate from April 14th, 2008 but they didn’t. A few days ago, before all ths excitement about Alphainventions started, Clustrmap had counted around 5,000 visits, while my WordPress stats said 8,000. It seems that they have been counting different things – so what’s the difference?
I now await another automatic update from Clustrmap to see what it has made of the weekend views/visitors, which have amounted to approximately 12,000 according to WordPress.
As I write this it is 10.15pm on Sunday and, so far today, there have been 3,732 views according to WordPress, of which 3,500 came before 10am. According to my WordPress stats only 2,811 views were referred by Alphainventions. This is a handsome figure by any standards, especially on a Sunday when things are quiet in the blogospere (at least in my experience). But it means that I have had 921 views which are not accounted for in my stats – yes, they are included in the daily total etc. but I have no idea where they came from!
It gets “curiouser and curiouser” and I wonder whether any of these statistics from any of these sources mean anything at all.
Should I be excited, delighted, elated or just plain fed up? I don’t know.
Yesterday, almost exactly 24 hours ago, I published the post about Money for Old Cars and went to the Alphainventions site straight afterwards to do the business there, as described in my previous post. Normally, by doing that, I could expect to get perhaps 40-60 additional views at this blog over the following 24 hours. Yesterday was different. Within about an hour I had 200 views, which reminded me that I had not yet written a post about Alphainventions though I had been using their service (when I remembered) for some time.
So I wrote and published the post there and then, again visiting the Alphainventions site afterwards to follow the usual procedure. During the next hour, up to midnight, a further 200 views were added to my total. Naturally I was pleased about all those views and hoped that some of the “visitors” would become regulars. Beyond that, I thought no more about it and went to bed.
Imagine my surprise when the numbers of views were increasing still, and into the thousands, when I looked this morning. Now, however, I was not so happy.
I have been blogging more or less regularly, but not especially frequently, for about a year. In that time my total views had arrived at 8,000, there were 110 posts, and 375 approved comments. That was 24 hours ago. I now have 3 more posts (including this one), 2 additional comments (one from a new visitor) and, wait for it… … 15,303 views.
What I would like to know is, why did well over 7,000 views produce only one comment? It doesn’t make sense. What are these “views”? Are they real people just like my regular visitors? Or did that amazing increase in views include some WWW wizardry of a sort that I don’t begin to understand (like “pings” and “RSS feeds” and the like) but which is not real visitors to the site at all?
I have emailed Alphainventions requesting an explanation. I hope to receive a reply soon and until then I will reserve judgement.
I have no idea how or why alphainventions.com do what they do but I know how it affects my blog and it has therefore earned a mention here.
So far as I can work out the idea is that, as soon as you have published a new post, you should click across to Alphainventions and fill in a couple of boxes. As a result of this your blog will join a short list of others that will be displayed, one after another, in their front page until displaced by still more bloggers doing the same thing. The net result is that you will get a noticeable increase in visitor numbers to your blog.
On arriving at the Alphainventions website it is necessary to wait for about a minute while the “My Blog” box near the top of the page prepares for you. When it display http:// you should fill in the rest of your blog’s address. Then select a category in the next box to the right (a drop-down menu) – choosing one that is relevant to your new post, then click on the button (next right) “Notify readers about my blog” and on a couple of pop-up menus that follow. That is all I have done so far. On the days on which I have followed this procedure, I estimate that my visitors have increased by anything from 20-60 over what I would have expected without help from Alphainventions. I hope that some of them will become regular visitors – that’s what blogging is all about after all.
I have yet to look further into Alphainventions. Perhaps it is possible to pay for longer periods of “exposure” and it may well be a viable proposition for those running business websites. So far I am happy to benefit from the free service and to spread the word about Alphainventions in return. This is not a recommendation but if, like me, you like what it can do for your site, why not give it a go?
I was confused. It’s not unusual. When I wrote a few days ago about making use of more pages in this blog, I was mistaken about what is and is not possible in a WordPress blog. My idea was to start separate pages for cycling, painting, and other topics and to put relevant posts on those pages. This is not only impossible but also unnecessary. Listing posts under different topics is what “categories” is for and I have plenty of categories already, as listed in the righthand column of this screen. If anyone wants to see only the cycling posts, and ignore everything else, all they have to do is click on the cycling category.
Another detail that was bothering me was that I was building a very long list of links in the righthand column. I do not want too many links because few visitors are going to visit all of them and, though all the other blogs concerned are, or have been, very interesting, I do not have enough time to visit them all with the regularity that they deserve. So again I have pruned a few links and replaced about half of them with new ones. I have also revised the link categories, deleting (among others) “other interesting blogs” but adding some blogs from there to the “A list” which is much higher up the page where they should be seen more easily.
It is, as they say these days, a “Work In Progress”. Do I need to list the most recent posts? Does Clustrmap serve any useful purpose now that it is getting a bit crowded? Do I want my Flickr photos here?
I should run a poll, except that I haven’t worked out how to do it! Instead I’ll ask for your comments. Which widgets do you consider essential in a blog, and in what order, starting from the top of the column?

